Now, this is going to seem like a red herring, but we are a narcissistic bunch here. If there’s one thing we can do well, it’s talk about our personal problems and/or adventures. Get three or more volunteers in one place and there is no limit to the length at which we can drone on about the same thing. The Internet has just projected this onto a more accessible forum. Unfortunately, with only one person talking to what they think or hope is many, the only comments they can make are about themselves. The blog, live journal, or whatever you want to call the personal little world-wide-waxing-on is possibly the most arrogant invention of this generation. This isn’t some grand revelation, but it became glaringly apparent last month when I reread some (most?) of my own postings and some selections from other volunteers. No headless goat or frantic hike was too small to occupy at least a paragraph or two. Make no mistake though, I don’t claim to be above all this. I’ve spun more than my fair share of tales and I’ve certainly kept the subject content limited to el numero uno. But I think there is a fine line between the entertaining absurdity of PCV life and the disconnected brain waves of my own inner fool. Expressing an opinion is one thing, but with the advent of broadcasting our ‘deepest’ thoughts to the world, we have reinvented the village idiot from ancient times, and digitized our more contemporary crazy-guy-standing-on-the-corner-yelling-at-cars. But of course, those guys can be fun. I really enjoy the one I always saw with the five foot cardboard sign standing on the corner of Fifth and Pine near the Westlake Center in Seattle. He would yell out in this raspy voice at anyone within earshot, shaking his fist at the unfortunate passerby. Every town has one, so in the spirit of tradition, put your chair in neutral and carefully lock your doors, ‘cause I got a bone to pick and a really big piece of cardboard.
So here it is. My (and some others’) thoughts on development: I can really only speak from experience here, but talking with other volunteers who have done this in other parts of Africa and the world has led me to some conclusions that might be totally wrong. Of course, I’ll say them here anyway. This development thing doesn’t work in its current state. There, I said it. The idea is nice when it’s placed in a two sentence mission statement, but when actually applied it’s more of a feel good version of monkeys banging on typewriters. Peace Corps bangs on one typewriter trying to get out the words “To be” while VSO pounds away at “not to be” and World Teach is over in the corner doing their best to come up with “or”. If by some miracle we each come up with our parts at the same moment, we are still a light year from pushing them all together to create a full phrase. Not to mention the fact that if three monkeys handed you a piece of paper with “to be or not to be” written on it, you wouldn’t know what to do with it. But I’m getting too into the thought of monkeys beating modern technology and I want to get back to what I’m tying to say. The current method of development will never work because of three main reasons: first, the culture differences between the host nation and the donor nations prevent effective transfer of skills and funding. Second, the western form of donation breeds dependence. Finally, and most frustratingly here, the development work is executed with shocking inefficiency. I’m going to try to explain these, and maybe accidentally stumble upon some suggestions.
Problem 1: The culture block
When you think of a developing nation, you will most likely come up with a nation which was formerly under colonial rule by some western nation. Chances are that colonial nation is now one of the donors attempting to lift the newly independent nation out of poverty. In the case of Namibia, there hasn’t even been a generation since independence, leaving at least one or two generations of people who have the memories of apartheid still in their recent memory. It’s certainly not hostile, but think of this: I come into a school hall full of the parents of the school learners. These are all parents who grew up being told what to do by white people. Everything from where to live to what type of bread to buy was dictated by the complexion of their skin. Now we are in a town hall meeting to try and determine what can be done to improve the school pass rates. The most successful learners in school are the ones who have the most proficiency in English since all the teaching as well as the standardized exams are in English. I voice this fact along with the suggestion that encouraging their kids to read the free English periodicals available or even watching television in English from a young age can help them tremendously later in school. This, by the way, is how several of my students have told me they first started picking up English. If you are one of these parents who have seen white people living in a totally different world from them, and now the one white guy stands up and suggests this, would you take him seriously? This really did happen and I’m sure some people understood and at least considered what I was saying. But from the blank stares (after translation into Afrikaans and Damara), I might as well have told them that they needed to make their kids sleep facing south east with a papaya in their non-dominant hand.
In addition, if the memories of colonial rule were sufficiently distant, or even if they weren’t, a functioning method of national operation would have developed before the arrival of aid. That is to say, regardless of how recent independence was obtained, a country stable enough to have development aid has a work culture that must already be functioning. People must be going to work, water and other utilities are most likely semi-stable and there has to be some sort of government and existing society. However, the finer points of this work culture will be at least foreign and at most mind-blowingly confusing. This past term, I was in charge of organizing transport for six learners going to a leadership camp in Windhoek. I had to get four learners from a school in the middle of nowhere (search for Okangwati on your favorite mapping program) to Opuwo where they would spend the night. Then they had to come down to Khorixas to pick up myself and two more learners and continue on to Windhoek. I admit that I have no idea how this would work in the states but I don’t think it would work like this: I faxed a letter to the director of education for the entire region (in Opuwo) two months early. He approved it and forwarded it to the education inspector of the northern Kunene region a month later (without telling me) who then sent it back to the transportation officer (three weeks later) who works here in Khorixas. I’m now one week from when I have to leave and panicking that I don’t have transportation. Three days before we’re supposed to leave, I get a call from the volunteer in Okangwati saying that he heard from one of the drivers that all was approved but we were leaving a day early. What? I went from thinking I would have to bribe private transport by phone, to leaving a day early. But this is normal for transportation in Namibia. Of course trying to change this backwards method or even trying to follow it not only gets you nowhere, but if you whine and yell too loud, it can get you left behind when you really need that transport. This seems specific, but is just one of many examples of the basic needs that somehow function here, but in a totally foreign way. It rarely has a direct effect, but the proximate effects come up enough that certain aspects of development are slowed or dropped completely because the basic needs are met in a different way. For example, I wouldn’t bother trying to hold a workshop for anyone other than teachers who live in Khorixas because transportation would be a nightmare even to get teachers from as close as fifty kilometers to Khorixas.
Assuming the colonial past and the foreign method of logistics work out, there is still the simple fact that the things we bring are exactly that: brought. The volunteer brings computers which the locals view as the volunteer thing. If your school functions well on faxes, why adopt email? Another example I’ve mentioned before is my school’s physical science lab. I can figure out what most of the chemicals and apparatuses are, but it was brought by a previous volunteer (most likely not solicited but also not rejected) and has since collected dust and will most likely collect dust after I leave. I can’t force any other teacher to use the lab, I can only make it as accessible as possible and leave it. Which segues nicely to my next point…
Problem 2: The dependence
These resources which are brought get left to the next volunteer who may arrive in a week, a month, or a decade. But no matter how long, it will most likely be left alone until white-boy Joe from Freedom Land gets there. That’s not to say the resources are not valued, it’s more like the adult version of a new toy. Every school in Namibia will have computers on its top three list of what it wants/needs. But when the computers arrive, no one wants to learn them. This is the way that the most well meaning donation or resource gathering project can just end up creating a little crack baby school. Bring in a resource that only the volunteer knows how to use, then you will need another volunteer. And after they get there, you don’t have to worry about learning anything about it, the volunteer will take care of it! We have our lab, our library, our computers and the chess club which were all created and/or improved by a volunteer but the staff and management think they need a volunteer to maintain them.
The second problem that the volunteer dependence causes is the fatalist attitude between the schools which do not have a volunteer, but see the schools that do. Several times, I’ve heard teachers from other schools say something to the effect of, “if we only had a volunteer, we would do better” or “Wahoo! Now we have a volunteer who will bring us everything!” An example was when I asked what my school wanted, one teacher said that I should get the town council to pave all the streets. Aside from the fact that the school really won’t benefit from that, I really don’t think the town needs paved streets, nor do I think that’s something I can do. The flip side of this messiah-esque status is that no idea I have is too stupid. If I had said, “Sure I’ll put all my effort into paving your streets. While I’m at it, I’ll get a wireless broadband tower installed” I’d still get an enthusiastic nod from everyone despite the fact that no one would have a wireless card and the single internet line going to South Africa through Windhoek can’t handle broadband. I’m still waiting to come up with an idea that my principal rejects. All of them certainly weren’t good because most I’ve come up with have since failed or fizzled out, but none were rejected outright. I wouldn’t be surprised if he agreed to a “fund raising” trip using learners to smuggle diamonds from Angola.
This isn’t much of an issue on the grass-roots level of a school, but there are aid workers going all the way up the ranks in the form of donors, consultants and simply acquaintances, all of them giving their two cents on how to improve something. The only thing preventing it from being a benevolent neo-colonization is the simple fact that aid organizations are a herd of cats which are incapable of working together.
The dependence then leads to projects failing during the window between incoming and outgoing volunteers or the failure of a project because the next volunteer simply has no knowledge of how to continue it, or does not want to. In this way, the dependence is working from both sides. The school, community, etc. wants another volunteer to take care of the things they have not yet mastered (whether or not by choice) and the volunteer wants to be replaced because they don’t want to see all their hard work dropped because of a lack of working knowledge, so both end up requesting another volunteer.
Problem 3: Inefficient aid
In any developing country there are multiple organizations working to accomplish similar goals but not officially working together. Instead they stumble upon each other within communities in the form of volunteers seeing the other at the local store. It’s up to the individuals to develop any sort of cooperation or pooling of resources to work towards a common goal. I had the benefit of meeting the person I replaced, and he told me there was a sports volunteer (SCORE) and a VSO I would be living with. In this way, I knew of the other volunteers in town and when the SCORE volunteer left, she was replaced by another, who I also met. In knowing the new SCORE volunteer, we started working together on the community hall project that I have mentioned before. Now, you would think that our parent organizations would at least know that there was a volunteer from the other organization in the same community so we could easily start something like this, but when I mentioned SCORE to our country director, he didn’t even know they were in the country or what they did.
This self-centered stance can even take the form of not wanting to appear like the other organization. I have heard, though not first hand, that some in VSO are advised not to carry around Nalgene-style water bottles since it is the Peace Corps label. Yeah, we carry Nalgenes and wear Chaco sandals so you can spot a PCV from a kilometer away. And we are also in harrier places than you and we don’t charge the host country for our work… so you can take your “volunteer” service organization and… well, you get the idea. But this is not the time or place to air my beef with VSO. Safe to say and contrary to all my grievances, I’m damn proud to be a part of Peace Corps.
The fact that some organizations are not even aware of others is minor compared to some of the more common errors in development execution. A favorite for NGOs (non-government organizations) and any other aid group is the all empowering WORKSHOP. Like so many other things in aid work, the idea is good, but the execution leaves things a little… well… undeveloped. A workshop can cover anything from a specific training on implementation of the new testing methods for physical science to the something as ambiguous as a “wellness workshop”. The idea is that one person from each region or community is trained at the workshop and then holds their own local workshop later to further pass on the skills. Sort of a Reagan-esque trickle-down development method. Good idea in principal and certainly the most efficient transfer of skills I can think of, the only problem is that it is never followed through. The workshop is held, people eat a bunch of food, there are some training sessions, and then everyone goes home. The following staff meeting, the principal looks at the teacher who just spent a week learning how to create a practical lab assignment and says, “What can you tell us about the workshop?” The teacher says, “It was very nice and we learned many interesting things. Those people from (fill in your favorite western country here) are good in science.” And…? What did you learn? Will you show others? When can we learn these things? Nope. Go to your own dagburn workshop if you want to know! But as far as the organization is concerned, they have done their job and can return with wide grins to tell all their friends, “I taught real African teachers how to make labs out of common things in their community!” So long as the number of people can be documented and sent back to the donor country, the money will keep pouring in. Aid workers are happy because they’ve done what they can, the parent nation is happy because the bureaucrats have numbers to make graphs with, and the host nation is happy because they got another twenty-bazillion-whatevers spent on them. So who’s to complain? Me! I get to watch a South African NGO hold a Wellness Workshop (whatever that means) that pays for a dozen Ministry of Education staff from each of the thirteen regions to go to Swakopmund, the vacation destination of Namibia. Travel, accommodation and food are all paid for in addition to all the workers still being officially on the clock at work. On top of all that, since it is a work related trip, everyone gets what is called S&T. S&T is an allowance paid by the government of Namibia to the workers to pay for their Stay and Travel expenses. Never mind that’s already paid for. Just to run that by one more time: the attendees of the workshop are paid their regular salary and given compensation for the travel and accommodation which has been provided for in such excess that people actually bring Tupperware containers to these events to take back food. A combined expense that would total several hundred thousand Namibian dollars if not a few million. Is that money well spent? Well, with less than 250,000 Namibian dollars, all of the learners at my school could go to school for and stay in the hostel for free with extra money left over to improve the food for an entire year. I think that would improve their “wellness”. Oh, I almost forgot. All those workers don’t make up for the lost time and productivity, things are just pushed back a week.
The biggest culprit of this sort of aid-based, government-supported graft is the warm and fuzzy HIV/AIDS workshop. What! You think we should stop sending money to prevent HIV/AIDS in Africa?! You must be some sort of evil, red, horned Beelzebub who stomps baby puppies and drives a Ford Excursion! No, that red is just sunburn and the horns are a slowly receding hair line. That puppy was a cockroach and a donkey cart just looks like a Ford Excursion in poor lighting. The jury is still out on the definition of “evil”, though I’m hoping for a plea bargain. In reality, Namibia is workshopped out and the money that comes in to hold more of these workshops is a waste. A student in grade seven here knows more about the transmission and prevention of HIV than most of the American population. So why do the infection rates continue to go up? Because there is nothing else to do! You can have as many posters, trainings, clubs, songs, dramas, magazines, awareness weeks and anything else, but at the end of the week, the only Friday or Saturday night activity for any age in small-town Namibia is going out drinking. Namibia doesn’t need another training or club about how to avoid “risky” behavior, it needs someone to fund an entertainment business that doesn’t sell alcohol. But the idea of giving money to the Khorixas Recreation Hall instead of the HIV/AIDS Club Meeting Room is a difficult one to wrap your mind around. Although, I do think it’s easier than trying to wrap your mind around the idea that no matter how much money gets pumped into HIV/AIDS prevention programs, the infection rate continues to rise. But like I said, I might be evil.
This workshop business is an example of the more broad idea of how ineffective it is to execute development from a western standpoint. Something gets lost in the translation when western governments assist in a way that makes sense to them. If you give a village woman $200 US to start her own business, in all likelihood she won’t put in a quarter of it and save the other $150 to cushion the inevitable initial loss. Instead she’ll spend it all on a combination of the business and her family members. Similar to the other cultural mismatches, the long term is not a priority here. I come to this conclusion after countless examples and several Namibians saying the same thing, so don’t start throwing around the R-word. Yet another example: at school, we are allocated a certain amount of copy paper to last the entire year. Last year we ran out before the middle of the third trimester so I suggested that this year we allocate a certain amount to each teacher depending on how many classes they taught. Then, keep the reserve for making end-of-term exams. That way, if a teacher ran out of paper, it was their own fault and would have to wait until next term to get more unless they could get some from another teacher or buy their own. We got most of the way through the first trimester this year when a teacher in the morning staff meeting said he had run out of paper and needed more. The principal said that the teacher just had to come to the office to get more, which got resounding approval from other teachers who had also run out of paper, but hadn’t mentioned anything. I voiced again that if we just hand out paper without a second thought, what was to prevent another situation similar to the one last year? “Oh, right. We must be careful” was all I got. The long term? I guess we’ll deal with that when we get there. And this isn’t just my interpretation. I was driving with one of the teachers from my school past two men herding their cattle along the highway. Due to the droughts this year, the wide embankments on the edge of the highway are the only places with a decent amount of grass left. I shook my head and commented on how meat would be expensive next year. My companion looked at me confused and I had to explain my rationale that if there was a drought this year, cattle would be sold cheap before they died of starvation. If more cattle were sold for less money this year, then next year there would be less cattle sold for more money. Fairly simple supply and demand, but still projected at least eighteen months in the future. The teacher contemplated this for a moment and said that that was why America had prospered more. He said that he had a hard time thinking of the end of this year and the end of next year had never come to mind.
These are just two examples of a number of situations where I’ve been presented with evidence of, and sometimes an individual stating that, the long term plan is non-existent. If you invest in an individual here, you also have to get his or her mind off of all the currently impoverished relatives they have, which is most likely the motive for starting the business in the first place. But how can you say to a person that they need to sit on that $150 for a year or two when their niece is getting kicked out of the hostel for not paying her fees? The solution is a tough one to swallow, and I’ll get to it later. For now, I have a few more bones to pick at.
Moving away from the individual and to the more national view, the development work I have seen has little to no real long term plan. We were part of the five year review of Peace Corps goals in Namibia where we all sit down and look at the goals of PC Namibia and adjust them based on what we have experienced. The goals were fairly specific but there is no real plan to achieve them and certainly no exit point where Peace Corps will say, “We’ve done all we need to for now, time to go.” I realize this is not reasonable in the true spirit of aid but at least to know what the previous volunteer was trying to achieve would be a good thing to communicate to both the next volunteer and the administration in general. But I’m getting ahead of myself. The fact is, when Peace Corps and other organizations go into a community, there is no plan for what needs to be done in the community or what should take priority. If five people are working to renovate a house, all of them should, say, replace the roof instead of one person sweeping the floor, with another repairing a door handle, two painting the west facing wall and one more checking all the bulbs. We are all trying to do our own little part to help the community, but not working together or cohesively on the local or national level between new and more seasoned workers makes our work become painfully inefficient. This problem is exacerbated by the fact that the few resources available to volunteers are slow in arriving and involve a nest of red tape to negotiate. As a PCV, I can apply for one PEPFAR (Google it if you don’t know what this is) funded initiative during my service for a maximum of $3000 USD. I have a dilapidated classroom at my school that fits the bill easily but only needs about $600 of money to renovate it. The recreation hall in town, on the other hand, is a much greater resource to the community and would address the HIV infection rate much better but it is difficult to honestly tie this directly to HIV prevention since it is more a secondary prevention method. Plus the fact that the hall needs closer to $4000 to make the minimum improvements needed to get into working order. And since I applied for the classroom funding first, now I have to wait an additional three months for the recreation hall grant to go through, by which time it will most likely lose momentum. So now I have to start going to other donors for funding while the grant is in stasis at PC headquarters in Windhoek. If it does get approved, I will most likely have to decline the PEPFAR money from PC for the hall since I will have already secured the other donor. Got an extra $4000 lying around? Because it would save me a lot of letter writing and phone calls. Just kidding (but not really).
Volunteers and development workers are sent to nations with the best of intentions, but given the largest preventable obstacles to overcome. A volunteer who is willing to work for basically nothing but the experience should be given the most flexibility in what they do. Instead, we have administrations that are unaware of other organizations, much less knowledge of how to work with them. We are dropped in communities where there may be other volunteers, but we have to find them on our own. We fly blind for months figuring out what others have done before us and also failed at, wasting time and resources on things which should have been communicated to us from the start. If by some chance we do stumble upon a promising project which has not been beaten on before, we spend all our remaining time jumping through administrative hoops with the most honest goal being that, hopefully, another volunteer will show up to see the fruits of our labors and pick up the pieces. Alright, Mr. Pessimist, you got all these complaints, but how about some suggestions? I’m glad you asked.
Development, seriously!
1.) Make Host Country Governments Responsible
Existing development organization policy states that we have to be “invited” but you “invite” someone to a party. You don’t “invite” the plumber over to fix the toilet. You state a problem, a desired solution and a smart customer might even try to learn something in the process so they don’t have to call the plumber again. In the same light, a host country should have to develop a plan incorporating whichever organizations they propose to involve, delegating tasks and setting specific, testable milestones to be met. Not just, “improve math competency” but “develop a national average of X% by this date with further improvements of Y% until such-and-so”. Development and aid organizations would then work with the host government to create or modify a reasonable national goal, with consequences and completion rewards, before the work starts. The consequences mentioned would be on a more local level and I will explain them later.
The broad national plan would be disseminated to regional heads that identify target cities or communities with a reason that fits into the national plan. The communities are then tasked to develop community plans. Which schools both need help and have the potential to succeed? What resources are in the community and what can be developed with what priority? Who, specifically, will hover, learning how skills are used and how it all works? For each goal the community has, they must have a plan for how it will be sustained. I don’t mean a counterpart who, in reality, has another job and won’t ever be around. I’m talking about at least two people who will be present for the entire project, and each of them should have an alternate who can be used in the event that one is absent. Notes should be taken, questions asked and learning made a priority. As motivation for those counterparts, have guaranteed jobs lined up for them upon completion.
Again, using the experience I have as an example. Khorixas has six schools, including one of the worst in the nation, a large community hall, two empty swimming pools, a few empty buildings and a big housing problem. At present, there are two VSOs (one education administration and one social work), two PCVs capable of physical science and mathematics subject content, and one SCORE volunteer. As far as the schools go, start at the bottom. Make training four to six months for volunteers working in schools instead of the basic two month fly-by we get currently. During that time, learn the local language fluently so we can be useful in the lowest of primary classes, thus getting a solid education base started in the community. During the school term, the PCVs work on resource development in ALL the schools, not just one. They spend one term at each school learning the ins and outs of that school, team teaching and helping where needed. They focus exclusively on improvement of the first grade teachers with the help of the VSO education volunteer. Meanwhile, the VSO education volunteer holds afternoon training sessions for the first grade teachers with the PCVs helping the teachers implement the skills learned in the classroom. This is done concurrently nationwide within a two year window. In other words, by the third year, any community with a volunteer should have all of its grade one classes done. New communities should be established in the same way, starting from the bottom up, and held to a similar schedule. For instance, if the nation is mostly at the grade four stage (already completed grades one, two and three) when a new community establishes an acceptable community plan, the new community should start at grade one, not four.
Back to the Khorixas example. All the volunteers would work with the VSO social worker to identify and help get out-of-school youth back into school. The SCORE volunteer would work with PCVs to incorporate sports clubs in schools and create positive after school clubs. The VSO education and social worker would also work with the management staff at different schools on how to incorporate disabled students and effective discipline methods that are alternative to whacking the kids with sticks. The resources of the community would be placed in order of greatest impact. I believe that would initially be focusing donor money on housing projects and business development. However, these would be secondary to the primary projects of each volunteer. To accomplish all these things, each volunteer would have a certain amount of money ($5k-$10k USD?) at immediate disposal for funding such programs. To replenish those available funds, justification of the funding and potential of the project would need to be provided, but after the fact since a good project with momentum behind it cannot wait five months for funding. In a sort of shoot-now-ask-questions-later tactic, make the paperwork due after the fact. So when the community sets up a committee to improve the community hall, the funds are available to start work immediately. In short, reward innovation instead of passivity.
Of course, prior to any of this, the Ministry of Education would have worked with Peace Corps, VSO and SCORE to put a plan together with the target schools and community leaders. The resources that the community lists would need to come with a plan for how the resource could be used and what would be needed. Most importantly, there would have to be a set of local workers who would be there to learn skills. These community members would be there primarily to transfer skills and provide a realistic cultural perspective, with no reservations when the volunteer is about to commit a cultural faux pas. This would help with things like the transportation fiascos I mentioned earlier. If a new volunteer had to organize something like that, they would spend an untold amount of time and patience going through the wrong avenues. In addition, the local community member would have a much better idea of who to go to for various things. How do I get the rental of the hall transferred to a new name? Who should I contact to get an empty field leveled to make a soccer pitch? These are things that may have never come up with any previous volunteer but a local person would know immediately.
By entering the community with a plan in place, and communicating where the volunteer fits into that plan, the volunteer would be more prepared to make a reasonable amount of progress towards the goals of the community. This would most likely require communicating to a volunteer where they will go prior to departure from their home country and more overlap with the previous volunteer upon arrival. An honest description of the tasks would prevent the waste of resources that goes into moving a volunteer or sending him or her home early. Having a longer overlap of previous and new volunteers would provide the best training possible for entering a community and allow for a window period where the volunteer could get an honest assessment as to whether or not they can be of help to that site. If these things can be coupled with placing more resources (money and access to transport) at the volunteers’ disposal, real progress could be made on a grass roots level and in an amount of time that the community members who have skills transferred would be able to put them to use immediately.
With all the extra resources coming into the community with the volunteers, there would have to be some incentive to completion of different aspects of the overall community plan. These could be in the form of further donations of things like books, additional computers, funding for infrastructure development, etc. True, there are already programs in place which bring these into developing countries, but there is always more need than resources. The government would have to take in the donations and distribute them based on acknowledgement of various completions. To prevent sending too many resources into one school or community, these types of rewards would need to be large enough to be a good incentive but only on a one-time basis.
These rewards (volunteer resources, rewards for completion of projects) would also have to be combined with the possibility of a form of punishment for the mistreatment or mismanagement of volunteers and/or resources. For instance, a school could be barred from receiving another volunteer or the government could distribute resources to a different community. This would further tie the concept of good planning and progress to reward.
For example, my school has six computers that are still used only on an informal basis and certainly not to their full potential. If one volunteer could train several teachers in how to hold computer classes and then those classes were held for a long amount of time, at least a year, without the additional assistance of the volunteer, the school could be rewarded with additional computers. If the community hall is completed on schedule with the community leadership in place to run it, the first year of rental could be waived by the municipality and the utilities could be paid using donor money distributed by the government. On a national level, the consistent progress of a developing nation could be rewarded with things like reduction/removal of loan interest, increased imports or simply public/official recognition of progress to bring the nation more in the world’s eye, especially for foreign investment. On the other hand, if a school drags its feet on providing housing to a volunteer, the school could be barred from requesting another volunteer from any organization for a certain amount of time. If the government is found to be distributing funds in an inappropriate manner or exaggerating progress, the various funding agencies could pull their moneys.
In short, progress will not be made if there is not a tangible reward for all the parties involved and a real consequence for conscious, preventable failure. Planning and a cohesive execution of that planning by everyone will keep progress solidly in place.
Final Thought
This is a confession and a little something for those considering the Peace Corps or other government organization as a sort of intermission from their so-called normal life (not that anyone outside my family and a few last state-side friends reads this, but I’ll say it anyway). I enjoy the development work here, that is clear to me. Making a career of it is certainly appealing right now. The only problem is that I’m not working in development right now. I’m working in Public Relations. The three goals of Peace Corps are:
To help the people of interested countries meeting their needs for trained men and women.
To help promote a better understanding of Americans on the part of the peoples served.
To help promote a better understanding of other peoples on the part of Americans.
So 67% of my job is helping America interact with “other peoples”. This explains a lot of the “help” we do here. We are dropped into a community and told to help them, but not given the tools which are actually needed. And of course there’s not an exit strategy, or indicators, if the community is sufficiently helped. We are a bunch of under paid, benevolent PR representatives for the American government. And the sooner PCVs or prospective PCVs realize this, the sooner they will understand all the frustrations they have or will have. I’m officially not here to help anyone, I’m here to promote America. Again, not really any grand revelation, and I’ve known this for some time, but it seemed like the time to voice it. Still, I’m proud to be a part of it and now with about half a year left, I’m looking back on my time fondly and I wouldn’t have wanted to spend it any other way.
Green light.